Forum:Petition to revoke Blue Ninjakoopa's adminship

From Pikipedia, the Pikmin wiki
Revision as of 01:39, June 30, 2010 by Jimbo Jambo (talk | contribs) (Created page with '{{Forumheader|Watercooler (Pikipedia)}} <!-- Please put your content under this line. Be sure to sign your edits with four tildes ~~~~ --> To begin, Blue should not have been …')
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Watercooler (Pikipedia) > Petition to revoke Blue Ninjakoopa's adminship


To begin, Blue should not have been an admin in the first place. When this wiki held nominations, he applied, but was rejected due to his past behavior. It was not until DarkLordRevan, founder of the wiki, paid everyone a surprise visit and promoted three contributors with good track records (one being me, I admit) straight to bureaucrat. Revan, I'm sorry to question your judgement here, but a dedicated contributor does not a good administrator make.

That aside though, what does keeping Blue as an admin do for the wiki? He does delete the occasional spam and is quick (perhaps too much so?) to punish violators. But with the number of other active admins we already have, and at least one checking Recent Changes every day, having an extra janitor around just does not do us a lot of good.

How does having Blue on detract from the quality of the wiki? Blue's personality flaws are numerous and blaring. He is extremely argumentative (not constructively so), very rude, and spiteful. He is also hypocritical, often saying something to give himself leverage in an argument when his behavior suggests he believes the opposite, and does not always operate with the wishes of the community in mind. He has been the center of several meaningless and very avoidable disputes, out of which came nothing but bad blood. These things would barely be tolerated by a regular user, but for an administrator, the public face of the wiki, to behave so childishly when dealing with a new user, rule breaker, or even veteran contributor, it is absolutely unacceptable. It serves nothing but to impede the growth of the wiki by driving away potential contributors and giving it a bad reputation.

The evidence is all here, hidden in the histories of multiple pages, but citing it seems like a waste of effort when everyone here is sure to have had at least one bad encounter with this user. This being such a big decision, and me not even being sure exactly how to follow through with it, I need the consensus of the community to make something happen. —Jimbo Jambo 05:39, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

Comments