Talk:Burgeoning Spiderwort mold: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Jimbo Jambo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:Um...no. It just stops Burgeoning Spiderworts from growing; Pikmin can attack it.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | :Um...no. It just stops Burgeoning Spiderworts from growing; Pikmin can attack it.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | ||
==Move to "Mold-like growth"== | |||
First, note that there's a move button on articles. Second, what makes this any less of an 'official' title than what it was previously? There is no official name, and this seems like a weird thing for the title of a page. I think just 'mold' would be best, but the extra description in 'Burgeoning Spiderwort mold' is nice.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | |||
:Agreed. This is the very reason the Conjectural Title template exists. I would personally vote for just "Mold," but I could swing either way depending on what everyone else thinks. {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 21:09, June 8, 2010 (UTC) | |||
:Whatever these things are, they closely resemble [[Wikipedia:Puffball|puffballs]], types of fungi. I think that name is more suiting for the article. Or, if Burgeoning Spiderwort mold is the official name (I recall Olimar calling it that), why don't we use that?? <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 00:32, June 9, 2010 (UTC) | |||
::I agree, mold-like growths sounds a little too iffy. We could move this to Burgeoning Spiderwort mold, and make the article "Mold" redirect there.--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}} | |||
:::I don't understand why the move to a singular title was necessary when we're changing the name anyway.... I'm just going to change it back to what it was before. No, it is not actually an official name, and Olimar never says anything about it, but there was no reason to change it in the first place, so unless someone else also wants to change it to "Mold," the consensus seems to be just to revert it. {{user:Jimbo Jambo/sig}} 22:36, June 9, 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:48, June 9, 2010
It's called a growth in the booklet.--
the master --MewFan128 01:48, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- I think that's just a term, not really a name for it. I don't think there is any name, so just call it by how it looks - like a mold. Anyway, it would be annoying to change every instance of 'mold' on the wiki, and 'mold' is probably more obvious to people than 'growth'. GP
Doh.--File:Images.ijpg the master --MewFan128 13:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Can Pikmin Die in mold(or mud) ?
Move to "Mold-like growth"
First, note that there's a move button on articles. Second, what makes this any less of an 'official' title than what it was previously? There is no official name, and this seems like a weird thing for the title of a page. I think just 'mold' would be best, but the extra description in 'Burgeoning Spiderwort mold' is nice. GP
- Agreed. This is the very reason the Conjectural Title template exists. I would personally vote for just "Mold," but I could swing either way depending on what everyone else thinks. —Jimbo Jambo 21:09, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Whatever these things are, they closely resemble puffballs, types of fungi. I think that name is more suiting for the article. Or, if Burgeoning Spiderwort mold is the official name (I recall Olimar calling it that), why don't we use that?? BNK [E|T|C] 00:32, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't understand why the move to a singular title was necessary when we're changing the name anyway.... I'm just going to change it back to what it was before. No, it is not actually an official name, and Olimar never says anything about it, but there was no reason to change it in the first place, so unless someone else also wants to change it to "Mold," the consensus seems to be just to revert it. —Jimbo Jambo 22:36, June 9, 2010 (UTC)