Talk:Hocotate: Difference between revisions

From Pikipedia, the Pikmin wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:


:Already took it out.
:Already took it out.
However, the items are apparently sold not for their historical/sentimental value, but for their practical one. For example, Olimar marvels at the "unlimited" energy of a battery. It is valued for its "advanced" technology, though it is relatively primitive, making it ironic. However, in the way it is currently worded, it sounds to opinionated. I suggest we reword maybe. [[User:IAMAHIPO ocolor|<span style="color:Black">IAMAHIP<b>O_o</b></span><span style="color:Red">c</span><span style="color:#ddbb00">o</span><span style="color:Blue">l</span><span style="color:Purple">o</span><span style="color:Grey">r</span>]] 02:19, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:19, July 7, 2009

is the atmosphere carbon dioxide or methane? im not sure if the game ever tells you? Something more universal than a quarter needs to be used for size comparison. Discordance 09:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

"With such advanced technology, it is ironic that comparatively primitive human-made objects are considered valuable treasures." This statement seems a bit odd - surely it's just the same as us considering the relics of ancient civilizations to be valuable? -- Anon 12:10, 21 Feburary 2005 (EST AUS)

Agreed. I found the irony worth mentioning, though...--Prezintenden
Same here, what makes something valuable is not the object is make how rare it is.--[url="http://www.WolfMark6.webs.com"][img]http://img527.imageshack.us/img527/2166/werehogsignatureex7.png[/img][/url] 14:10, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Meh, nothing to say here. I'm ~LonelyRedpikminsprite.jpgTurret~ And I approve this message.
...Then why make an edit? GP
....Why not? I was bored... I'm ~LonelyRedpikminsprite.jpgTurret~ And I approve this message.


Treasure Value

I don't like the fact that the treasures are not valuable for Hocotatian people because of their old technology. If we find a caveman's ax, we put it in a museum, don't we? Twinmold.pngSnakeboss14Twinmold.png

Already took it out.

However, the items are apparently sold not for their historical/sentimental value, but for their practical one. For example, Olimar marvels at the "unlimited" energy of a battery. It is valued for its "advanced" technology, though it is relatively primitive, making it ironic. However, in the way it is currently worded, it sounds to opinionated. I suggest we reword maybe. IAMAHIPO_ocolor 02:19, 8 July 2009 (UTC)