Talk:Libra glitch

I believe this was separated from the article before and we chose to put it in the main article. I think that, since this page is so short, it should be made a redirect to that part of the article.


 * I agree

Unless this redirect is going to be categorized under Glitches, it should probably be deleted, and links redirected to the Libra article. 21:18, 16 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I think this is more for if people are searching 'Libra glitch', in which case they're sent to the right page via this one.


 * Why would someone search for that? This is the place they would most likely hear about it first. Also, we could categorize the redirect as such. We wouldn't have a useless article, but it would still be easy for someone looking for glitches to find. 18:56, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The same reason we have prezidant ... well it was some odd redirect... that I don't know how to spell. Ah, Prez knows...


 * ...Are you suggesting someone could misspell "Libra" as "Libra Glitch"? 20:31, 17 January 2009 (UTC)


 * No, no... I'm saying someone has or is bound to search for it...


 * Yeah, there's no problem with having a redirect, right? And what you're saying about categorising it - would that work for a redirect?  Would it make sense?  Should 'Libra glitch' not be the one categorised in that way instead?


 * Yes categorize Libra Glitc than redirect to Libra...


 * Yeah, you can categorize redirects - I'm pretty sure the Zelda Wiki does that, actually. The reason why we might want to do that is so it can still be categorized as a glitch without requiring its own article and without categorizing the Libra treasure as a glitch. Also, yeah, like Crystal said, once somebody clicked the link in the category, they would be redirected to the appropriate section of the Libra article. 07:33, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Ha! I had a good idea. Win!