Talk:Cupid's Grenade

This page is about the treasure, no? Then why isn't there a special page for the cherry in Multiplayer mode? Pik dude  01:53, December 23, 2009 (UTC)


 * The cherry in 2P is Cupid's Grenade.


 * Then how are there multiples of them? I think that there is a difference between Cupid's Grenade and the 2p Cherry. Pik dude 200px-Mario you phail.gif 19:17, December 23, 2009 (UTC)


 * Because 2Player mode is not part of the canon? Like how the onions have entered caves, and there are multiple Crystallized Telekinesises, and that Olimar and Louie are against each other and other obviously not-part-of-the-story-mode elements? --Yoshord 00:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)

Inconsistent Desciption
Uh...If I can ask, ISN'T OLIMAR'S JOURNAL ENTRY DIFFRENT IN THE GAME THEN THE ARTICLE? Bulborb63 00:14, 20 December 2010 (EST)
 * I have the PAL version and just confirmed that the text in the article is the same as the one in the game. Maybe the NTSC version is different? {EspyoT}
 * It matches the NTSC version. I don't know about the PAL GC version, but the PAL New Play Control version is different:


 * "What a perplexing fruit... It appears to possess two curiously conflicting traits. At times, consuming it can bring forth wonderful feelings of love and affection. At other times, it can completely suppress all romantic inclinations. Its unpredictable nature means that I must be careful with it. I'll also warn Louie, or else he's liable to try baking it in a pie."


 * Are you playing the Wii version? Miles 16:31, 20 December 2010 (EST)


 * Okay, the italics/quotation marks around the entries make it impossible to do this by making changes to the notes pages alone, so I'll have to modify the template. I'm thinking, since only NPC will differ, have /journal (NPC) and check for this in the template.  G  P 

this is strange WIKI PHANTOM (talk) 14:53, 2 August 2013 (EDT)

An image for a real cherry
There is aready a image of a real cherry, so I think the missing image(s) part needs to be taken down. TabuuandMasterCore (talk) 21:41, 29 February 2016 (EST)
 * Right you are. All done. &mdash; {EspyoT} 06:13, 1 March 2016 (EST)