Information for "Talk:Blaxcaps"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
View the protection log for this page.
Information from Extension:WikiSEO
Basic information
| Display title | Talk:Blaxcaps |
| Default sort key | Blaxcaps |
| Page length (in bytes) | 1,785 |
| Namespace | Talk |
| Page ID | 4069 |
| Page content language | en - English |
| Page content model | wikitext |
| Indexing by robots | Allowed |
| Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
| Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Page protection
| Edit | No extra protection (infinite) |
| Move | No extra protection (infinite) |
Edit history
| Page creator | Jimbo Jambo (talk | contribs) |
| Date of page creation | 11:19, June 2, 2010 |
| Latest editor | GPBot (talk | contribs) |
| Date of latest edit | 06:28, September 16, 2010 |
| Total number of edits | 13 |
| Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
| Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Page properties
| Transcluded templates (4) | Templates used on this page: |
SEO properties
Description | Content |
Article description: (description)This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Eh... —Jimbo Jambo 15:19, June 2, 2010 Should we delete this page? If we let it stay, should we remove the conjecture tag at the top of the page as the term "blaxcap" was used by Prima? Wait...is Prima considered offical? Pikmin1254 I agree with Greenpickle. Snakeboss14 |