Editing Pikipedia:Proposals
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
:Of course, fansparency should only be applied where no alternative presents itself. But what do we consider “no alternative”? Say we have a really low-quality but transparent official image. In that case, do we use it, use non-transparent better quality images, or do we allow fansparency even though there is an official transparent image? This situation may apply to things like some of the P2 renders. [[User:Supremekirbo|Supremekirbo]] ([[User talk:Supremekirbo|talk]]) 07:30, September 10, 2023 (EDT) | :Of course, fansparency should only be applied where no alternative presents itself. But what do we consider “no alternative”? Say we have a really low-quality but transparent official image. In that case, do we use it, use non-transparent better quality images, or do we allow fansparency even though there is an official transparent image? This situation may apply to things like some of the P2 renders. [[User:Supremekirbo|Supremekirbo]] ([[User talk:Supremekirbo|talk]]) 07:30, September 10, 2023 (EDT) | ||
::I feel the need to bring up that a good chunk of the Pikmin 2 flora and fauna renders on Pikipedia (the really tiny ones with terrible contrast from about 2006) | ::I feel the need to bring up that a good chunk of the Pikmin 2 flora and fauna renders on Pikipedia (the really tiny ones with terrible contrast from about 2006) was already tampered with, as they're sourced from the Pikmin 2 Player's Guide, which has screenshot boxes covering some of the images. The person who uploaded the images just edited those boxes out and tried to fill in the blanks, which was pretty easy due to the resolution of the scans. -[[User:Gulliblepikmin|Gulliblepikmin]] 09:34, September 10, 2023 (EDT) | ||