44,445
edits
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
:::::Well, yes, that was exactly the idea. The stuff we already have to do that works via a class, so ''display: none'' only happens once the JS has loaded, which probably comes at the end of ''<body>'' (too lazy to check) - so it will get loaded before it's hidden. To make it start fully hidden, I expect we'd have to write something new. Also, I guess I was thinking more a placeholder with the same size as the video rather than just a link, to avoid making the content reflow. <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> 14:46, 22 November 2013 (EST) | :::::Well, yes, that was exactly the idea. The stuff we already have to do that works via a class, so ''display: none'' only happens once the JS has loaded, which probably comes at the end of ''<body>'' (too lazy to check) - so it will get loaded before it's hidden. To make it start fully hidden, I expect we'd have to write something new. Also, I guess I was thinking more a placeholder with the same size as the video rather than just a link, to avoid making the content reflow. <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> 14:46, 22 November 2013 (EST) | ||
::::::Ah, right right. In fact, I think I envisioned that, but ended up saying a link would be better. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 10:00, 23 November 2013 (EST) |