44,424
edits
Talk:Piklopedia (Pikmin 2): Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(editing page for Pikmin Wiki migration (internals note: from file: 'importjson-mergetalk-Talk-Talk')) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 201: | Line 201: | ||
I heard that there was a tangible Piklopedia only released in Japan. Is this true??? - [[User:Nathansack74|Nathansack74]] ([[User talk:Nathansack74|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nathansack74|contribs]]) | I heard that there was a tangible Piklopedia only released in Japan. Is this true??? - [[User:Nathansack74|Nathansack74]] ([[User talk:Nathansack74|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Nathansack74|contribs]]) | ||
== Locations == | |||
Do we ''really'' need a table by location? If somebody wants to know where an enemy is, they can go to its article. You could argue that this table is useful to see which enemies are on an area, but then you can just go to an area's article. Plus, sorting the table (which isn't even available on mobile, by the way) by area won't really work well, because of the way we list the areas. It's ugly, a bit arbitrary, and useless. I say we get rid of it. While we're at it, we don't really need a list of "other" creatures. This is a remnant from when the Piklopedia article used to explain enemies and serve as a general "list of enemies and creatures" article. The article should only be about the Piklopedia; the rest of the info is now organized in its own articles, like [[enemy]] and [[vegetation]]. I'll do this cleanup in some days if nobody objects. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 15:14, 1 October 2015 (EDT) | |||