Talk:Twilight Hollow: Difference between revisions

From Pikipedia, the Pikmin wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(...)
Line 9: Line 9:
:::We've always had a fair amount of work put into guides. Caves, treasures, enemies, etc. all have these sorts of guides. Not everybody has the availability to watch a video playthrough. For most people, video is better, but we still have to have text. We are a wiki, after all, not a video storage website. Having text ''and'' a video to complement it would be the best, but even still, just text will do nicely for a wiki. If people want video guides specifically, they don't go on wikis, they go to YouTube right away. Your idea of having videos is good, but we still have to have text guides. We can debate further the style of the guides, and maybe make those guidelines global for all guides on the wiki, though. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 14:32, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
:::We've always had a fair amount of work put into guides. Caves, treasures, enemies, etc. all have these sorts of guides. Not everybody has the availability to watch a video playthrough. For most people, video is better, but we still have to have text. We are a wiki, after all, not a video storage website. Having text ''and'' a video to complement it would be the best, but even still, just text will do nicely for a wiki. If people want video guides specifically, they don't go on wikis, they go to YouTube right away. Your idea of having videos is good, but we still have to have text guides. We can debate further the style of the guides, and maybe make those guidelines global for all guides on the wiki, though. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 14:32, 26 August 2014 (EDT)


::::Text > video for two reasons: collaboration and accessibility.  Wikis are about both of these things.[[User:GPBot|GPBot]] ([[User talk:GPBot|talk]]) 16:34, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
::::Text > video for two reasons: collaboration and accessibility.  Wikis are about both of these things. <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> 16:35, 26 August 2014 (EDT)

Revision as of 16:35, August 26, 2014

Strategy?

Should we make strategies for Mission Mode stages? I'd say we should just give tips and tricks, not entire strategies. AeroBlaze777sig.png Talk

Well, we do want to have strategies, but not ones that are so intricately detailed, like the one here. These kinds of "strategies" cause headaches for players... ~PikFan23 21:24, 25 August 2014 (EDT)
Maybe add the tips here, and link to a video of a strategy? I don't think that this giant bundle of text would be useful. Nobody's got time to read through that, and would rather see it in action. AeroBlaze777sig.png Talk
We've always had a fair amount of work put into guides. Caves, treasures, enemies, etc. all have these sorts of guides. Not everybody has the availability to watch a video playthrough. For most people, video is better, but we still have to have text. We are a wiki, after all, not a video storage website. Having text and a video to complement it would be the best, but even still, just text will do nicely for a wiki. If people want video guides specifically, they don't go on wikis, they go to YouTube right away. Your idea of having videos is good, but we still have to have text guides. We can debate further the style of the guides, and maybe make those guidelines global for all guides on the wiki, though. — {EspyoT} 14:32, 26 August 2014 (EDT)
Text > video for two reasons: collaboration and accessibility. Wikis are about both of these things. GP 16:35, 26 August 2014 (EDT)