Pikipedia:Featured article/nominations

From Pikipedia, the Pikmin wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page is used to nominate articles to be featured on the Main Page. To nominate an article, create a new section titled the name of the article you nominate, then create 'support' and 'oppose' subsections and sign your name under 'support', along with your reasons if necessary. Other users can then sign their support or opposition and the article will be featured when a new one is needed if it has enough support.

A featured article must be well-written, as complete as is feasible and interesting to read. This requires that it also has adequate appropriate tables, diagrams or images.

Scale

I think this is a good article bc it has a lot of info, shows how to solve them, and has good pictures. IAMAHIPO_ocolor 15:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

Booooooring. Scales are lame.

Comments

Firstly, I think some bits need rewording, as it's a bit...wordy. After that, I'll reconsider. GP 16:49, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Super Smash Bros. Brawl

I'm partly doing this to attract attention to it, as the article is probably lacking a lot of the information it could have. Also, I think it's a good article to feature as SSBB's the game of the moment, and it does have a few interesting pictures and bits of writing. GP 15:49, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Support

  • (Nominator) GP
  • The fact that it isn't about the games themselves annoys me. However, you have convincing points... Heck, I'll give it a yes. It won't hurt anyone.--Prezintenden
  • I support it as long as the discription on the front page says something like "Super Smash Bros. Brawl is a Nintendo Fighting Game in which Olimar is a playable character." 67.172.252.52 01:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Oppose

Comments

Bulbmin

I like Bulbmin because the bulborb-pikmin symbiotic relationship is so unique and compelling, in particular the Juvenile ones you can control. Also, players of Pikmin 2 who stopped playing before encountering them might feel compelled to play it again. 71.205.154.176 23:45, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Mikeburnfire

Support

  • (Nominator)Mikeburnfire
  • I don't see any reason why it shouldn't be featured. IAMAHIPO_ocolor 03:20, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
  • I think bulbmin are awesome an need to be shown. - Jaypikmin

Oppose

  • Right, they're the only non-mentioned Pikmin, so I'll count them as a spoiler; as small as it is. It's certainly an article still worth featuring, but not now. --Prezintenden 18:54, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Also, would it be possible to split up the Bulbmin topic into "Bulbmin (adult)" and "Bulbmin (Juvenile)"? I know that they are both part of the same species, but their roles as enemies and pikmin are vastly different.

I see no reason why to do so. This discussion was also held here. Adding Bulbmin to the main page is rather spoilish. Do we ignore this fact? I'm not sure to what extent this would spoil.--Prezintenden
Actually, I split the page quite a while back, sorting everything out. GP

Captain Olimar

He's the main character and has a great article so why not?

Support

  • (Nominator) Bucktooth_Tuba
  • C'mon guys, this is Olimar! Who cares if he's been featured before, he's the main event! I support. Mikeburnfire 20:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Mikeburnfire

Oppose

  • Okay, I'm actually going to oppose. Firstly, it's a bit predictable, not exactly a novel feature. Secondly, for one of the main articles, half of it is a retelling of the story of both games. It needs some reorganisation at the very least. Finally...we can't all support everything, as it'd be impossible to choose one. GP 18:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
  • Ditto.--Prezintenden
  • Ditto-errrr... trito?~CrystalRedpikminsprite.jpgLucario~ 12:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Comments

Burrowing Snagret

A fairly popular enemy, but not as common as the Red Bulborb, for example. Also, it is a boss, but not very spoilish. I think the article is well written too. 67.172.252.52 01:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Support

Oppose

  • I think this has already been feautered about the time I started coming... <.<'~CrystalRedpikminsprite.jpgLucario~ 12:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
    It was agreed that if an article was recently faetured in the auto rotation, it is irrelevant and can be featured now again. I would keep this for the future, as it is a good article.--Prezintenden 13:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Comments