261
edits
Pikipedia:Proposals: Difference between revisions
m
→Regional differences: responses
(2 replies) |
m (→Regional differences: responses) |
||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
::::Information from official media like that is considered debatable canon, according to the current canon policy. Are you suggesting we change this? — [[User:Soprano|'''Soprano''']]<sub>[[User talk:Soprano|''(talk)'']]</sub> 20:34, February 12, 2024 (EST) | ::::Information from official media like that is considered debatable canon, according to the current canon policy. Are you suggesting we change this? — [[User:Soprano|'''Soprano''']]<sub>[[User talk:Soprano|''(talk)'']]</sub> 20:34, February 12, 2024 (EST) | ||
:::::It may be important to change this policy since Garden is essentialy a "Word of God" canon. It provides information in a much more digestable manner, with most of the info being already present in 4's notes. Obviously, things like the Pikmin 4koma would be non canon, but Garden is seemingly an official Nintendo wiki, complete with 3D model resources and unique renders. --[[User:Jpmrocks|JPM]] ([[User talk:Jpmrocks|talk]]) 01:17, March 4, 2024 (EST) | |||
:Since the topic of regional differences (especially relating to [[canon]]) is hugely unclear, I think a full policy to address this is required instead of stuffing it in along with [[Pikipedia:Canon policy|the canon policy]]. I've drafted one here: [[User:SupremeKirb/Localization policy]] - [[User:SupremeKirb|SupremeKirb]] ([[User talk:SupremeKirb|talk]]) 19:58, February 10, 2024 (EST) | :Since the topic of regional differences (especially relating to [[canon]]) is hugely unclear, I think a full policy to address this is required instead of stuffing it in along with [[Pikipedia:Canon policy|the canon policy]]. I've drafted one here: [[User:SupremeKirb/Localization policy]] - [[User:SupremeKirb|SupremeKirb]] ([[User talk:SupremeKirb|talk]]) 19:58, February 10, 2024 (EST) | ||
| Line 115: | Line 117: | ||
:::: I've made some changes to the draft policy. I do see that English and Japanese are the most important versions to document for us, but I've edited the page to clarify the priority order and when other languages are to be considered. What do you think of it now? We also need to consider the difference between regional versions and localization (see [[Talk:Region]]), and how this policy connects to other policies such as the canon policy. — [[User:Soprano|'''Soprano''']]<sub>[[User talk:Soprano|''(talk)'']]</sub> 20:34, February 12, 2024 (EST) | :::: I've made some changes to the draft policy. I do see that English and Japanese are the most important versions to document for us, but I've edited the page to clarify the priority order and when other languages are to be considered. What do you think of it now? We also need to consider the difference between regional versions and localization (see [[Talk:Region]]), and how this policy connects to other policies such as the canon policy. — [[User:Soprano|'''Soprano''']]<sub>[[User talk:Soprano|''(talk)'']]</sub> 20:34, February 12, 2024 (EST) | ||
::::: Do you have a link to the Draft Policy? I agree with your changes to the Region article being split in two, but IDK how or where to check the draft policy. --[[User:Jpmrocks|JPM]] ([[User talk:Jpmrocks|talk]]) 01:17, March 4, 2024 (EST) | |||
=== The nature of canon === | === The nature of canon === | ||