Display title | Talk:Figwort family |
Default sort key | Figwort family |
Page length (in bytes) | 459 |
Namespace | Talk |
Page ID | 22072 |
Page content language | en - English |
Page content model | wikitext |
Indexing by robots | Allowed |
Number of redirects to this page | 0 |
Number of subpages of this page | 0 (0 redirects; 0 non-redirects) |
Edit | No extra protection (infinite) |
Move | No extra protection (infinite) |
Page creator | Mariotime315 (talk | contribs) |
Date of page creation | 23:02, November 2, 2016 |
Latest editor | Espyo (talk | contribs) |
Date of latest edit | 12:57, December 31, 2016 |
Total number of edits | 2 |
Recent number of edits (within past 90 days) | 0 |
Recent number of distinct authors | 0 |
Transcluded template (1) | Template used on this page:
|
Description | Content |
Article description: (description ) This attribute controls the content of the description and og:description elements. | Could the Figwort possibly be related to the Pikmin? There is a bit of evidence. What family is the Chaenostoma cordatum in, in real life? Exactly... en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scrophulariaceae — Mariotime315 Let's-a go! 23:02, 2 November 2016 |