Pikipedia:Featured article/nominations: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:


A featured article must be well-written, as complete as is feasible and interesting to read. This requires that it also has adequate appropriate tables, diagrams or images.
A featured article must be well-written, as complete as is feasible and interesting to read. This requires that it also has adequate appropriate tables, diagrams or images.
==Onion==
This is a pretty basic aspect of the ''Pikmin'' series, but an interesting subject nonetheless. It provides sufficient information about the Onions, as well as each individual Onion type, along with general information about the Onions.
===Support===
*(nominator) {{User:PikminFanatic23/sig}}
*Meh, I guess it's okay. It is well written, and it does provide enough information. I see no reason to oppose, so I'll support. One last thing: at least it's not ''as'' desperately needed as a replacement as Burrowing Snagret was. We kept that for literally about a year, give or take. -[[User:Los Plagas|Los Plagas]] ([[User talk:Los Plagas|talk]])
*What Los Plagas said. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 08:01, 20 June 2013 (EDT)
*A well written page with pictures, information about the subject,and not too much straying from the facts, this is featured artice gold.- [[User:Robecuba]]
*Good enough for me. <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> 18:51, 20 June 2013 (EDT)
===Oppose===
*
*
*
===Comments===
14,178

edits