394
edits
Pikipedia:Proposals: Difference between revisions
→Regional differences: Reply about considering more languages
(A bunch of replies) |
SupremeKirb (talk | contribs) (→Regional differences: Reply about considering more languages) |
||
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
:: I think the general content of this policy proposal is good, but it still focuses too much on the Japanese vs. US English angle, when other localizations need to be considered too. — [[User:Soprano|'''Soprano''']]<sub>[[User talk:Soprano|''(talk)'']]</sub> 20:24, February 10, 2024 (EST) | :: I think the general content of this policy proposal is good, but it still focuses too much on the Japanese vs. US English angle, when other localizations need to be considered too. — [[User:Soprano|'''Soprano''']]<sub>[[User talk:Soprano|''(talk)'']]</sub> 20:24, February 10, 2024 (EST) | ||
::: I just don't know if that's practical or even feasible for Pikipedia. We already struggle enough with getting Japanese information, and the series is translated into a whole bunch of languages. Often the European language translations are based off NoA's or NoE's English first, and they don't always offer any new information. That being said, considering other languages can be useful, as mentioned in the {{hp}} example in the draft. What do you think could be changed? [[User:SupremeKirb|SupremeKirb]] ([[User talk:SupremeKirb|talk]]) 20:33, February 10, 2024 (EST) | |||
=== The nature of canon === | === The nature of canon === | ||