Forum:Strategy sections: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 35: Line 35:
:::::::I agree with Jimbo Jambo on this one.--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}}
:::::::I agree with Jimbo Jambo on this one.--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}}


::::::: Of course they will be strats. But they way they are now they blow up the unity of the pages. I cant put into words what I want the Title to be, but I want the sections to be worded like this "The mighty Red Bulborb may gulp up pikmin in one bite, but it is slow. Pikmin are able to either surround the creature before it can bite and defeat it, or they can use the weakpoint of the backside of the creature to defeat it without being harmed"
:::::::: Of course they will be strats. But they way they are now they blow up the unity of the pages. I cant put into words what I want the Title to be, but I want the sections to be worded like this "The mighty Red Bulborb may gulp up pikmin in one bite, but it is slow. Pikmin are able to either surround the creature before it can bite and defeat it, or they can use the weakpoint of the backside of the creature to defeat it without being harmed"


It needs to sound like an article, not a faq
::::::::It needs to sound like an article, not a faq
-[[User:Dark Lord Revan|Revan]] 01:22, June 15, 2010 (UTC)
::::::::-[[User:Dark Lord Revan|Revan]] 01:22, June 15, 2010 (UTC)


Yeah, he's right. {{User:Snakeboss14/sig}}
Yeah, he's right. {{User:Snakeboss14/sig}}