44,445
edits
Forum:Strategy sections: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:It doesn't make much sense to me. They technically die as seen when their spirit flies out of their corpse. Maybe replacing the word ''Kill'' with ''Defeat'' may make it better.--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}} | :It doesn't make much sense to me. They technically die as seen when their spirit flies out of their corpse. Maybe replacing the word ''Kill'' with ''Defeat'' may make it better.--{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}} | ||
::Feel free to revert them, BNK decided to change most of them entirely on his own. [[User:Miles | ::Feel free to revert them, BNK decided to change most of them entirely on his own. [[User:Miles|Miles.]] 13:26, May 21, 2010 (UTC) | ||
:::I'm not sure 'how to kill' is best, though, 'cause you can't kill them all - what do you put for, say, Ravenous Whiskerpillar? You get inconsistencies. Using 'defeat' in its place does make a bit more sense, but 'how to X' seems a bit informal to me, and I expect that was the reasoning behind BNK changing them. I guess I'm for 'how to defeat' if there are no other ideas.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | :::I'm not sure 'how to kill' is best, though, 'cause you can't kill them all - what do you put for, say, Ravenous Whiskerpillar? You get inconsistencies. Using 'defeat' in its place does make a bit more sense, but 'how to X' seems a bit informal to me, and I expect that was the reasoning behind BNK changing them. I guess I'm for 'how to defeat' if there are no other ideas.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | ||