Template talk:Featured article: Difference between revisions

Template talk:Featured article (edit)

356 bytes added , 16 years ago

no edit summary

14,178

edits

Revision as of 14:44, February 13, 2008 (edit) Prezintenden (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:41, February 14, 2008 (edit) (undo) Greenpickle (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 12:		Line 12:

	:A week? That'll depend on how long they should be. About the length they are now, or deeper? Given our amount of usable articles, I would prefer 2 weeks... However, I have never heard of switching with such. If we're writing new ones anyway, then we could shut down the auto rotate and switch manually, huh?--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}}		:A week? That'll depend on how long they should be. About the length they are now, or deeper? Given our amount of usable articles, I would prefer 2 weeks... However, I have never heard of switching with such. If we're writing new ones anyway, then we could shut down the auto rotate and switch manually, huh?--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}}

			::Yeah, that was what I had in mind. Basically elect an article to be featured, and take the introductory paragraph or two, fixing it up a bit to make it more presentable, and featuring that. As for length, there's no need to go much longer; looking at the other Wikis, it seems only a little shorter than average at the moment.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}