137
edits
Forum:New admin (again): Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Sir Pikmin (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
|||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* I nominate myself, because I have been with this wiki for a long time, am relatively mature and calm, and have a fair knowledge of mediawiki. I think I am very articulate and cordial. {{User:IAMAHIPO_ocolor/signature}} 18:07, 27 September 2010 (EDT) | * I nominate myself, because I have been with this wiki for a long time, am relatively mature and calm, and have a fair knowledge of mediawiki. I think I am very articulate and cordial. {{User:IAMAHIPO_ocolor/signature}} 18:07, 27 September 2010 (EDT) | ||
I nominate myself. I check the recent changes list for both Pikipedia and Pikcanon-NOT very frequently, I'm almost always on it. While on it I check every edit made since I've last seen the list, excluding trusted editors like Green, Vol, etc. I'm also the head admin on Pikcanon-NOT, and in addition I run our inter-wiki forums. I've been a member on Pikipedia for a year now, and admittedly haven't done a whole lot. However I've taken the time to learn Mediawiki code, proper admin etiquette, and many other things from Green and Prez. And if it helps any I'm the student-body vice-president at my school, so I'm good with problem solving and leadership skills. | |||
--[[User:Sir Pikmin|Sir Pikmin]] | |||
==Discussion== | ==Discussion== | ||
| Line 29: | Line 32: | ||
Why? He still can manage administrative tools, can he not? {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Vol2}} | Why? He still can manage administrative tools, can he not? {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Vol2}} | ||
Yeah, you shouldn't not vote for someone just because of their activity in chat. It doesn't mean that their not actually a person that can be responsible. I've seen Hippo do good in the recent changes at the old Pikipedia, and he is a strong candidate for the new admin.{{User:Sir Pikmin/sig}} | |||