Talk:Purple Pikmin: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 186: Line 186:


::Yes, that was my main concern as well. If we don't consider only hazards, it's going to be one gigantic list. I can understand the logic behind it, but mentioning they're resistant to wind would be better suited in the article's body. It's a resistance to something non-lethal, so it's less important, hence, less worthy to be on the infobox. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 07:39, 12 July 2012 (EDT)
::Yes, that was my main concern as well. If we don't consider only hazards, it's going to be one gigantic list. I can understand the logic behind it, but mentioning they're resistant to wind would be better suited in the article's body. It's a resistance to something non-lethal, so it's less important, hence, less worthy to be on the infobox. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 07:39, 12 July 2012 (EDT)
:::As per Espyo and GP.--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}}
578

edits