14,178
edits
Pikipedia:Featured article/nominations: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==[[Puffy Blowhog]]== | ==[[Puffy Blowhog]]== | ||
I nominate the page [[Puffy Blowhog]] to be featured. It is a very neat and tidy article, has lots of information, an image, and info on any glitches there might be involving blowhogs. It is also very detailed, and everything about it just seems ''right''. I have also just fixed it up, giving it much better sentence structure, and it now sound even more fluid to read than it did before. On top of that, the [[Burrowing Snagret]] article has been featured for almost a year, and we will need to find a replacement featured article instead. | I nominate the page [[Puffy Blowhog]] to be featured. It is a very neat and tidy article, has lots of information, an image, and info on any glitches there might be involving blowhogs. It is also very detailed, and everything about it just seems ''right''. I have also just fixed it up, giving it much better sentence structure, and it now sound even more fluid to read than it did before. On top of that, the [[Burrowing Snagret]] article has been featured for almost a year, and we will need to find a replacement featured article instead. | ||
==Support== | ==Support== | ||
Nominator. -[[User:Los Plagas|Los Plagas]] ([[User talk:Los Plagas|talk]]) | Nominator. -[[User:Los Plagas|Los Plagas]] ([[User talk:Los Plagas|talk]]) | ||
==Oppose== | ==Oppose== | ||
* <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> - Doesn't read great, not particularly well-organised, not very long, and the images aren't the best. A good enough article, but not worth being featured, IMO. | |||
==Comments== | ==Comments== | ||
It's pretty well organized, but it's so short... If there are other articles that would be better highlighted, I'd prefer one of those. Otherwise, I can support this nomination. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 07:18, 8 February 2013 (EST) | It's pretty well organized, but it's so short... If there are other articles that would be better highlighted, I'd prefer one of those. Otherwise, I can support this nomination. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 07:18, 8 February 2013 (EST) | ||