Pikipedia talk:About: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
No idea.  Either way, I think it should be at Pikmin:Pikipedia instead.  The Halopedia article was deleted because of the lack of sources referring to the site.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, supposed to give factual information and not to be used just as advertising.  This site is linked to in Wikipedia's Pikmin articles.
No idea.  Either way, I think it should be at Pikmin:Pikipedia instead.  The Halopedia article was deleted because of the lack of sources referring to the site.  Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, supposed to give factual information and not to be used just as advertising.  This site is linked to in Wikipedia's Pikmin articles.


Also see [[Pikmin:About]] which is basically the same page as this.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}
Also see [[Pikipedia:About]] which is basically the same page as this.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}


I don't know if it would violate their terms of service or not, but I suppose it wouldn't hurt to post it. Its not like we're posting it out of maliciousness, and it does reference an encyclopedia page, (not to mention a sub-section of Wikipedia's databases.) {{User:Me_just_in/sig}}
I don't know if it would violate their terms of service or not, but I suppose it wouldn't hurt to post it. Its not like we're posting it out of maliciousness, and it does reference an encyclopedia page, (not to mention a sub-section of Wikipedia's databases.) {{User:Me_just_in/sig}}