Talk:Horned Cannon Beetle: Difference between revisions

Line 51: Line 51:


"Implied" is not objective evidence. They have a different species name, they are a different species. Not our fault. -'''[[User:Bossclips|Bossclips]]'''
"Implied" is not objective evidence. They have a different species name, they are a different species. Not our fault. -'''[[User:Bossclips|Bossclips]]'''
:What would you say distinguishes this from the "spotty bulborb" -> "red bulborb" rename? "Though once mistaken for adult Armored Cannon Beetles" isn't that different from "Originally classified as the spotty bulborb", I'd say, and I explained in the section above why the scientific name specifically isn't a good argument. [[User:2 B|2 B]] ([[User talk:2 B|talk]]) 12:26, August 19, 2023 (EDT)
:What would you say distinguishes this from the "spotty bulborb" -> "red bulborb" rename? "Though once mistaken for adult Armored Cannon Beetles" isn't that different from "Originally classified as the spotty bulborb", I'd say, and I explained in the section above why the scientific name specifically isn't a good argument. [[User:2 B|2 B]] ([[User talk:2 B|talk]]) 12:26, August 19, 2023 (EDT)
Idk what to tell you, it's a different species. "Once mistaken" is far more vague than "Original classified". The latter directly addresses that former name and what it was changed to. "Once mistaken" could just as well mean "it looked like the one from Pikmin 1" as it does "i thought the one from Pikmin 1 was an ACB but it wasnt".  Again, this really isn't out fault, we're just documenting what the NA game is doing. The best way to fix it from here is to contact the translators and get the full story cause we've done all we can do. -'''[[User:Bossclips|Bossclips]]'''