14,178
edits
Talk:Sheargrub: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
Jimbo Jambo (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Quite a number of pages have [[Special:Wantedpages|links]] to the Sheargrub article. Most of them do because they were made before separate male and female articles were made and linked to this one when either was mentioned, but in other cases, it's a reference to the species in general, not a specific sex (like in the [[Twig]] article). When I cam across pages with the latter case, I would relink them to Mandiblard, but I'm wondering if it would make sense to remake the Sheargrub article. It wouldn't have to have much, maybe a short description and links to both male and female pages, but at least a little more than a typical disambiguation page. What do other people think? Just continue linking "Sheargrub" to Mandiblard? | Quite a number of pages have [[Special:Wantedpages|links]] to the Sheargrub article. Most of them do because they were made before separate male and female articles were made and linked to this one when either was mentioned, but in other cases, it's a reference to the species in general, not a specific sex (like in the [[Twig]] article). When I cam across pages with the latter case, I would relink them to Mandiblard, but I'm wondering if it would make sense to remake the Sheargrub article. It wouldn't have to have much, maybe a short description and links to both male and female pages, but at least a little more than a typical disambiguation page. What do other people think? Just continue linking "Sheargrub" to Mandiblard? | ||
:I'm not sure. I deleted it because I thought it weird to have Sheargrub information on Mandiblard, Male Sheargrub and Female Sheargrub. All the other enemies only have their own pages and a family page. Maybe they should just be delinked? If you do decide to recreate the page, I think that it would be best short.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | |||