Category talk:Walkthroughs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) m (2 revisions: cat+talk) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:No, that's pretty much it. Just try to keep in with the naming standards already in use for the others, but otherwise it's fine.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | :No, that's pretty much it. Just try to keep in with the naming standards already in use for the others, but otherwise it's fine.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | ||
==I don't agree with posting walkthroughs here.== | |||
We really shouldn't be posting walkthroughs here, since these walkthroughs are generally biased. Killing strategies or strategies to get a treasure/part are fine, but walkthroughs are generally much more biased. I don't like the idea of this. We should really leave walkthroughs to Youtube and Gamefaqs (but definitely not the GF forums; have you even seen what people post there?). --[[User:Thenewguy34|Thenewguy34]] 22:07, April 21, 2012 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:32, August 25, 2014
Hmm... I was just thinking... What should a guy do to "submit" a Walktrough? Just create a page starting with "Guide:" and after it's done, write a link to it on this page, or is there any other secondary methods? [SRB2]EspyoT 16:24, 8 November 2008 (UTC)
- No, that's pretty much it. Just try to keep in with the naming standards already in use for the others, but otherwise it's fine. GP
I don't agree with posting walkthroughs here.[edit]
We really shouldn't be posting walkthroughs here, since these walkthroughs are generally biased. Killing strategies or strategies to get a treasure/part are fine, but walkthroughs are generally much more biased. I don't like the idea of this. We should really leave walkthroughs to Youtube and Gamefaqs (but definitely not the GF forums; have you even seen what people post there?). --Thenewguy34 22:07, April 21, 2012 (UTC)