Talk:Boss: Difference between revisions

1 byte removed ,  7 months ago
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
Personally, I think that the threshold for a “tough enemy” is that they must have at least 2000 HP and the battle must take more than 3 seconds to end normally. I also feel that they can keep their status if they guard a numbered gate. Let me know what you think about the Tusked Blowhog’s status and my idea for what makes a “tough enemy.” [[User:Marxo Grouch|Marxo Grouch]] ([[User talk:Marxo Grouch|talk]])
Personally, I think that the threshold for a “tough enemy” is that they must have at least 2000 HP and the battle must take more than 3 seconds to end normally. I also feel that they can keep their status if they guard a numbered gate. Let me know what you think about the Tusked Blowhog’s status and my idea for what makes a “tough enemy.” [[User:Marxo Grouch|Marxo Grouch]] ([[User talk:Marxo Grouch|talk]])


If you read the article, you can see that (at the moment) they're classified by the music that plays when they appear. The song that plays for when you encounter the [[Tusked Blowhog]] in the [[Hectic Hollows]] is the same song that plays for the [[Jumbo Bulborb]], [[Mammoth Snootwhacker]], and the [[Titan Blowhog|Titan]] and [[Blizzarding Blowhog|Blizzarding]] Blowhogs. What you consider deserving of the title is irrelevant to how it's currently characterized. We're discussing ways to reformat the terminology to be as satisfying as possible while remaining objective, but it's hard without delving into subjectivity.
If you read the article, you can see that (at the moment) they're classified by the music that plays when they appear. The song that plays for when you encounter the [[Tusked Blowhog]] in the [[Hectic Hollows]] is the same song that plays for the [[Jumbo Bulborb]], [[Mammoth Snootwhacker]], and the [[Titan Blowhog|Titan]] and [[Blizzarding Blowhog|Blizzarding]] Blowhogs. What you consider deserving of the title is irrelevant to how it's currently characterized. We're discussing ways to reformat the terminology to be as satisfying as possible while remaining objective, but it's hard without delving into subjectivity. - '''[[User:Bossclips|Bossclips]]''' ([[User talk:Bossclips|talk]])
 
- '''[[User:Bossclips|Bossclips]]''' ([[User talk:Bossclips|talk]])