Talk:Seesaw block: Difference between revisions
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I think we should have a page like [http://www.mariowiki.com/Template:Conjecture this one] I found at another wiki, for cases like this.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | I think we should have a page like [http://www.mariowiki.com/Template:Conjecture this one] I found at another wiki, for cases like this.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}} | ||
I agree. [[User:IAMAHIPO ocolor|ocolor]] 02:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:51, December 1, 2007
Actually, I thought they are out of stone... Either way, would "scale block" sound better?--Prezintenden(babble)
I'm not sure what to call it, but wooden block sounds better than scale block in my opinion. Me_just_in
16:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
Don't know where 'scale' came from, but it might make sense if I knew what it meant. Are they really stone? GP
I think Scale is best, or if not scale, scale stone. We should make all others (wooden scale wooden block stone block ect) directed to scale. I vote for scale.
Yah, scale blocks sound about right. Although I think scale is better. Someone make new page as scale/ scale block and direct all other names toward it.
Ok. did it. Now, I am new, someone please direct Block, scale block, wooden block, stone block, wooden square, stone square, scale square, ect. to scale?
I think we should have a page like this one I found at another wiki, for cases like this. GP
I agree. ocolor 02:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)