Talk:Sheargrub: Difference between revisions

From Pikipedia, the Pikmin wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: Article needs to be split into two, especially for notes and categorisation purposes.~~~)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Article needs to be split into two, especially for notes and categorisation purposes.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}
Article needs to be split into two, especially for notes and categorisation purposes.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}
Quite a number of pages have [[Special:Wantedpages|links]] to the Sheargrub article. Most of them do because they were made before separate male and female articles were made and linked to this one when either was mentioned, but in other cases, it's a reference to the species in general, not a specific sex (like in the [[Twig]] article). When I cam across pages with the latter case, I would relink them to Mandiblard, but I'm wondering if it would make sense to remake the Sheargrub article. It wouldn't have to have much, maybe a short description and links to both male and female pages, but at least a little more than a typical disambiguation page. What do other people think? Just continue linking "Sheargrub" to Mandiblard?

Revision as of 16:45, February 14, 2008

Article needs to be split into two, especially for notes and categorisation purposes. GP

Quite a number of pages have links to the Sheargrub article. Most of them do because they were made before separate male and female articles were made and linked to this one when either was mentioned, but in other cases, it's a reference to the species in general, not a specific sex (like in the Twig article). When I cam across pages with the latter case, I would relink them to Mandiblard, but I'm wondering if it would make sense to remake the Sheargrub article. It wouldn't have to have much, maybe a short description and links to both male and female pages, but at least a little more than a typical disambiguation page. What do other people think? Just continue linking "Sheargrub" to Mandiblard?