Talk:Steve: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Prezintenden (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
::I say we just leave it as is. Should we protect it from just new users and anons, or from all users? {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Vol2}} | ::I say we just leave it as is. Should we protect it from just new users and anons, or from all users? {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Vol2}} | ||
:::I recall external redirects require more complicated codes. In our case, it might not actually be possible. I'll delete for now.--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}} | :::I recall external redirects require more complicated codes. In our case, it might not actually be possible. I'll delete for now.--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}} | ||
::::At least with that poor redirect, new users would realize they need to take it to the fanon wiki before trying to blindly delete the redirect and add content. With the page deleted, it's highly likely someone will try to recreate it. '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 09:16, 29 December 2010 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 10:16, December 29, 2010
I have an idea. Seeing as this is NON-CANON, we can redirect it to the Steve page at Pikmin Fanon. Then, we should block access to edit this page, so that no one tries to create a Steve page again. {EspyoT} 09:40, 28 December 2010 (EST)
- Nuts, it doesn't want to redirect automatically. We can either leave it as it is, or work around it with some HTML. {EspyoT} 09:44, 28 December 2010 (EST)
- I say we just leave it as is. Should we protect it from just new users and anons, or from all users? Vol (Talk)
- I recall external redirects require more complicated codes. In our case, it might not actually be possible. I'll delete for now.--Prezintenden
- I say we just leave it as is. Should we protect it from just new users and anons, or from all users? Vol (Talk)