Pikipedia:Featured article/nominations: Difference between revisions

From Pikipedia, the Pikmin wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Changing non-working sig to working one)
(moving to past nominations)
Line 5: Line 5:


A featured article must be well-written, as complete as is feasible and interesting to read. This requires that it also has adequate appropriate tables, diagrams or images.
A featured article must be well-written, as complete as is feasible and interesting to read. This requires that it also has adequate appropriate tables, diagrams or images.
==[[Puffy Blowhog]]==
I nominate the page [[Puffy Blowhog]] to be featured. It is a very neat and tidy article, has lots of information, an image, and info on any glitches there might be involving blowhogs. It is also very detailed, and everything about it just seems ''right''. I have also just fixed it up, giving it much better sentence structure, and it now sound even more fluid to read than it did before. On top of that, the [[Burrowing Snagret]] article has been featured for almost a year, and we will need to find a replacement featured article instead.
===Support===
*[[User:Los Plagas|Los Plagas]] ([[User talk:Los Plagas|talk]]) - Nominator.
===Oppose===
* <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> - Doesn't read great, not particularly well-organised, not very long, and the images aren't the best.  A good enough article, but not worth being featured, IMO.
===Comments===
It's pretty well organized, but it's so short... If there are other articles that would be better highlighted, I'd prefer one of those. Otherwise, I can support this nomination. — '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 07:18, 8 February 2013 (EST)
I'm going to side with Espyo on this one. I'm neutral on it. --{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}}
The introduction alone is a mess. I think the information isn't that bad but it needs a lot of rewriting first.--{{User:Prezintenden/sig}}
==[[Gate]]==
Seems to have all the necessary information, good structure, and worded well. <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span>
===Support===
* <span style="font-family:times;color:#080">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|G]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050">P</span>]]'''''</span> (nominator)
*{{User:Gamefreak75/Sig}}
*[[User:Pikpikmate|Pikpikmate]] ([[User talk:Pikpikmate|talk]])
*{{User:Prezintenden/sig}}
*-[[User:Los Plagas|Los Plagas]] ([[User talk:Los Plagas|talk]])
===Oppose===
===Comments===
So are we going to use this or not? The current article is going to have been featured for a year soon, and since Puffy Blowhog most likely isn't going to win, I think we should just go with this one. -[[User:Los Plagas|Los Plagas]] ([[User talk:Los Plagas|talk]])

Revision as of 08:00, March 18, 2013

Archived nominations can be found at Pikipedia:featured articles/past nominations.

This page is used to nominate articles to be featured on the Main Page. To nominate an article, create a new section titled the name of the article you nominate, then create 'support', 'oppose' and 'comments' subsections and sign your name under 'support', along with your reasons if necessary. Other users can then sign their support or opposition and the article will be featured when a new one is needed if it has enough support.

A featured article must be well-written, as complete as is feasible and interesting to read. This requires that it also has adequate appropriate tables, diagrams or images.

Retrieved from "https://www.pikminwiki.com/index.php?title=Pikipedia:Featured_article/nominations&oldid=71489"