Talk:Carrying glitch: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Hmmm... I think it's more because it's not quite what you'd call a glitch. It's actually a bit intended. If half of a piece is stuck inside the wall, the game was told on purpose to '''not''' let the Pikmin walk inside the wall to be able to grab it. And since a part of it is unreachable, the piece may be irretrievable. What the article needs is a recreation. The glitch should be about the piece actually getting stuck in the first place, and not about the Pikmin refusing to grab out-of-reach sides. '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 11:09, 4 September 2011 (EDT) | :Hmmm... I think it's more because it's not quite what you'd call a glitch. It's actually a bit intended. If half of a piece is stuck inside the wall, the game was told on purpose to '''not''' let the Pikmin walk inside the wall to be able to grab it. And since a part of it is unreachable, the piece may be irretrievable. What the article needs is a recreation. The glitch should be about the piece actually getting stuck in the first place, and not about the Pikmin refusing to grab out-of-reach sides. '''{''[[User:Espyo|Espyo]]''<sup>[[User talk:Espyo|T]]</sup>}''' 11:09, 4 September 2011 (EDT) | ||
::That's [[embed glitch]]. Agreed that this isn't worth an article. <span style="font-family:times;">'''''[[User:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#080;">G</span>]][[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:#050;">P</span>]]'''''</span> 11:16, 4 September 2011 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:16, September 4, 2011
Deletion
I don't really know if we should delete this. According to our policy, "A glitch should have its own article only if it is repeatable or common. A repeatable glitch is one that always occurs under some given conditions that aren't too specific. A common glitch is one that multiple players have reported, and the details do not vary a lot."
Wouldn't this count as a repeatable glitch? --JelloratbobFile:Emperorbulblaxroaring.jpg 09:21, 4 September 2011 (EDT)
- Hmmm... I think it's more because it's not quite what you'd call a glitch. It's actually a bit intended. If half of a piece is stuck inside the wall, the game was told on purpose to not let the Pikmin walk inside the wall to be able to grab it. And since a part of it is unreachable, the piece may be irretrievable. What the article needs is a recreation. The glitch should be about the piece actually getting stuck in the first place, and not about the Pikmin refusing to grab out-of-reach sides. {EspyoT} 11:09, 4 September 2011 (EDT)
- That's embed glitch. Agreed that this isn't worth an article. GP 11:16, 4 September 2011 (EDT)