Talk:Counter glitch: Difference between revisions

From Pikipedia, the Pikmin wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(No difference)

Revision as of 16:26, March 8, 2011

Image:Proggglitch.JPG Man, I never thought this would become so popular. Should we redirect this? Or make a new page?--Prezintenden 08:13, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

What? Wait, why the link to the deleted image, and how is it popular? Oh, I get it; it's something you found before. Er, still needs rewriting. GP 08:41, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Whoops, my bad. Forgot to change this one. Yeah, I was surprised that more people are finding this. Wait, no, not surprised. Uh, uh... intrigued. Yeah, that's it.--Prezintenden

Glitch Question

The article says it should be standing at the landing area after the egg disappears. Do they mean stand as in stay in the same spot, or do they mean standing as in it sits there for a second, and then starts to walk around? ~SwordFile:SK.PNGKnight~ 02:31, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Renaming

Should we rename it to 'counter glitch', seeing as it can also happen in Forest Navel and presumably other places? Or should we shorten it and put it on the Progg and FN pages?--Prezintenden

Yeah, based on second paragraph saying you don't need the Progg, I'd say so. It may as well keep its own article, though. GP
So apparently certain people who actually don't know what they are talking about think that we should keep this as an article because people seem to encounter this quite often. I'd rename this to 'Counter glitch' and keep it as a page and add the more general variation of Pikmin death glitching it. Any additional thoughts on this?--Prezintenden
That was a bit confusing. They don't know what they're talking about, about keeping this as an article, but you're suggesting keeping it as an article? Either way, it's been pretty much unanimous here and on the chatroom that this is renamed to "counter glitch". {EspyoT} 19:32, 7 March 2011 (EST)
I was joking and referring to GP, who was going at this with a bit of a flawed logic (IIRC, but I'm not sure anymore), and with the 'keep as a page' I was basically agreeing to keep it as an article, nothing else. Renaming and rewriting now, then, I guess.--Prezintenden