Talk:Reference: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Greenpickle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Prezintenden (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I meant 'to what?'. The name seems wrong/misleading.- [[User:Greenpickle|<b><span style="color:Green">Greenpickle</span></b>]]<sub>[[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:Green">(talk)</span>]]</sub> 13:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC) | I meant 'to what?'. The name seems wrong/misleading.- [[User:Greenpickle|<b><span style="color:Green">Greenpickle</span></b>]]<sub>[[User talk:Greenpickle|<span style="color:Green">(talk)</span>]]</sub> 13:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
I agree, cameo doesn't really sound correct, but I can't come up anything else. I would have said "references" or "brand appearences", but those are even worse. | |||
Also, I find that this page only gives information that is completely obvious ''and'' is already given on the corresponding treasure articles, but since it has already been made it doesn't seem right to put in the deletion category. [[User:Prezintenden|<b><span style="color:Gray">Prezintenden</span></b>]]<sub>[[User talk:Prezintenden|<span style="color:Gray">(babble)</span>]]</sub> 17:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:59, September 28, 2007
I feel that this page needs to be renamed, but what to?- Greenpickle(talk) 19:08, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
What do you mean with "what to"? Prezintenden(babble) 08:02, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
I meant 'to what?'. The name seems wrong/misleading.- Greenpickle(talk) 13:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
I agree, cameo doesn't really sound correct, but I can't come up anything else. I would have said "references" or "brand appearences", but those are even worse.
Also, I find that this page only gives information that is completely obvious and is already given on the corresponding treasure articles, but since it has already been made it doesn't seem right to put in the deletion category. Prezintenden(babble) 17:59, 28 September 2007 (UTC)