Talk:Seesaw block: Difference between revisions

From Pikipedia, the Pikmin wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
I'm not sure what to call it, but wooden block sounds better than scale block in my opinion. {{User:Me_just_in/sig}}16:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure what to call it, but wooden block sounds better than scale block in my opinion. {{User:Me_just_in/sig}}16:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)


Don't know where 'scale' came from, but it might make sense if I knew what it meant. Are they really stone?{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}
Don't know where 'scale' came from, but it might make sense if I knew what it meant. Are they really stone?{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}


I think Scale is best, or if not scale, scale stone. We should make all others (wooden scale wooden block stone block ect) directed to scale. I vote for scale.
I think Scale is best, or if not scale, scale stone. We should make all others (wooden scale wooden block stone block ect) directed to scale. I vote for scale.


:Oh, I get it now, as in balancing scales. What about 'block scales', then?{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}
:Oh, I get it now, as in balancing scales. What about 'block scales', then?{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}


Yah, scale blocks sound about right. Although I think scale is better. Someone make new page as scale/ scale block and direct all other names toward it.
Yah, scale blocks sound about right. Although I think scale is better. Someone make new page as scale/ scale block and direct all other names toward it.
Line 33: Line 33:
::I was thinking [http://stuff.greenpickle.co.cc/scales.ogg the sound they make] is more of a giveaway.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}
::I was thinking [http://stuff.greenpickle.co.cc/scales.ogg the sound they make] is more of a giveaway.{{User:Greenpickle/sig}}
:::So it may be petrified wood. Even so, petrified wood is stone. I'm about to make the move. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 01:25, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
:::So it may be petrified wood. Even so, petrified wood is stone. I'm about to make the move. <font face="Eurostile" size="3">[[User:Blue Ninjakoopa|<span style="color:#00008B">BNK</span>]]</font><sup> <nowiki>[</nowiki>[[Special:EditCount/Blue Ninjakoopa|E]]|[[User talk:Blue Ninjakoopa|T]]|[[Special:Contributions/Blue Ninjakoopa|C]]]</sup> 01:25, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
 
No, you are not. {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Sig}}
  No, you are not, not until we all agree, or else it'll just be reverted. {{User:Volatile Dweevil/Sig}}

Revision as of 17:48, June 16, 2010

Actually, I thought they are out of stone... Either way, would "scale block" sound better?--Prezintenden(babble)

I'm not sure what to call it, but wooden block sounds better than scale block in my opinion. Me_just_inEarly Mushroom Pikmin.jpg16:51, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Don't know where 'scale' came from, but it might make sense if I knew what it meant. Are they really stone? GP

I think Scale is best, or if not scale, scale stone. We should make all others (wooden scale wooden block stone block ect) directed to scale. I vote for scale.

Oh, I get it now, as in balancing scales. What about 'block scales', then? GP

Yah, scale blocks sound about right. Although I think scale is better. Someone make new page as scale/ scale block and direct all other names toward it.

Ok. did it. Now, I am new, someone please direct Block, scale block, wooden block, stone block, wooden square, stone square, scale square, ect. to scale?

I think we should have a page like this one I found at another wiki, for cases like this. GP

I agree. ocolor 02:51, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

It's Featured, Yay!

But there should be a box that says "This is a currently featured article until May 15th, 2009" I'm RedpikminFire.PNGFlamethrower And I approve this message.

Eh... slight name change...

I think it would be best to change this article's name to Stone scale. I mean... it's like, more appropriate, and stuff. Just... yeah. What do you think? BNK [E|T|C] 07:29, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

I can't say I really oppose, but is it necessary? —Jimbo Jambo 17:12, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I believe so. It's a more suiting name for the article tbh. BNK [E|T|C] 18:13, June 13, 2010 (UTC)

I think they're wooden. GP

They're shaped like a stone, but the texture on them certainly looks like some sort of pale wood. I wouldn't be too certain.--Prezintenden
I was thinking the sound they make is more of a giveaway. GP
So it may be petrified wood. Even so, petrified wood is stone. I'm about to make the move. BNK [E|T|C] 01:25, June 16, 2010 (UTC)

No, you are not. Vol (Talk)