Pikipedia:Featured article/archived rejected nominations

From Pikipedia, the Pikmin wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page is an archive of the discussions around featured article nominations that have been rejected, though they can still be nominated again. For current featured article nominations, see Pikipedia:Featured article/nominations. For featured article nominations that were selected, see Pikipedia:Featured article/archived nominations. Please do not edit this page.

Captain Olimar[edit]

He's the main character and has a great article so why not?

Support[edit]

  1. (Nominator) Bucktooth_Tuba
  2. C'mon guys, this is Olimar! Who cares if he's been featured before, he's the main event! I support. Mikeburnfire 20:56, 10 May 2008 (UTC)Mikeburnfire

Oppose[edit]

  1. Okay, I'm actually going to oppose. Firstly, it's a bit predictable, not exactly a novel feature. Secondly, for one of the main articles, half of it is a retelling of the story of both games. It needs some reorganisation at the very least. Finally...we can't all support everything, as it'd be impossible to choose one.GP 18:13, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
  2. Ditto.--Prezintenden
  3. Ditto-errrr... trito?~CrystalRedpikminsprite.jpgLucario~ 12:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Comments[edit]

GO GO OLIMAR! I'm RedpikminRedpikminflamethrower Signature.pngFlamethrower And I approve this message.

Burrowing Snagret[edit]

A fairly popular enemy, but not as common as the Red Bulborb, for example. Also, it is a boss, but not very spoilish. I think the article is well written too. 67.172.252.52 01:49, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

No comments

Support[edit]

  1. I agree with nominator.IAMAHIPO_ocolor
  2. Me too. It's long enough and well-written. Could get a better image and have most of the first bit moved to 'how to kill', though.GP

Oppose[edit]

  1. I think this has already been feautered about the time I started coming... <.<'~CrystalRedpikminsprite.jpgLucario~ 12:11, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
    • It was agreed that if an article was recently faetured in the auto rotation, it is irrelevant and can be featured now again. I would keep this for the future, as it is a good article.--Prezintenden 13:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

S.S. Dolphin[edit]

Okay, think, this was the entire reason Pikmin 1 was started. If The Dolphin hadn't have any pieces blown apart, Olimar would just have blasted off again. Their would be no Olimar meeting Pikmin and the series wouldn't even exist. Pik kid 16:48, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

No opposers, no comments

Support[edit]

  1. I suppose. It's a bit short, but there's not much else it could have.GP

Emperor Bulblax[edit]

For[edit]

  1. I like it because it has a very detailed summary, and good pictures. Killer bread bug 72 Orange Bulborb Larve.jpg

Against[edit]

  1. That isn't that great of an artical, it looks like it should be on GameFAQ's and needs major fixing so it isn't purely a guide, and KB72 you should give us reasons... I'm ~LonelyRedpikminsprite.jpgTurret~ And I approve this message.
  2. Yeah, it has layout issues and sections aren't divided up very well. Some parts of the text are too long and just look daunting.GP
  3. He just ain't cool enough if you ask me. AFROMAN 22:18, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Comments[edit]

Good point...Killer bread bug 72 Orange Bulborb Larve.jpg

White Pikmin[edit]

No comments

Support[edit]

  1. 173.74.116.119 Perfect follow up for purple pikmin.
  2. 96.10.246.39 17:25, 2 May 2011 (EDT) - Fits the style of Pikipedia ;).
  3. Mrblob1012 (talk • contribs) per all

Oppose[edit]

  1. Vol (Talk) It's a good article, but it's not fit to be featured.
  2. Artwork of a Breadbug. Loafy the Breadbug Artwork of a Breadbug. I don't think it would be very good just to feature Pikmin and Creatures. Instead have something like an Area or Treasure.
  3. Not great for such an important article; everything's just dumped in the first section. GP

Hocotate ship[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. ==Ridly Metroid.gif Skree! 17:45, 28 July 2011 (EDT)
  2. Artwork of a Breadbug. Loafy the Breadbug Artwork of a Breadbug. Guess so, better than anything else we've come up with.

Oppose[edit]

  1. The one and only,Artwork of three Dwarf Orange Bulborbs.Peanut64. I would rather not advertise a major spoiler, the golden ship...
  2. Featured before. GP
  3. --Jelloratbob 13:45, 28 July 2011 (EDT)

Comments[edit]

  • This was featured before. Can we nominate previously featured articles? {EspyoT} 17:32, 29 July 2011 (EDT)
  • I'd rather not. Peanut: I wouldn't call it much of a spoiler, but yeah, I see your point. It seems we did actually have that sentence in the feature last time... (At least the image is hidden in the article.) GP
  • Yeah, I looked through the featured articles category but didn't notice that this was featured already. -_- Changing vote. --Artwork of the Sweet Dreamer.JelloratbobArtwork of the Sweet Dreamer. 17:15, 30 July 2011 (EDT)

Pikmin 3[edit]

No comments

Support[edit]

  1. -~-~-James92498-~-~- (talk) 19:59, 24 July 2012 (EDT) Real name: James. I chose this article just in case if there are a few Pikmin fans out there who haven't been on the internet in a while, but then decide to go on Pikipedia, they would see that theres a new Pikmin game right on the front page. they'd probably be all like, "WHOAH! I've been outside having a life so much, that I didn't even know there's a new Pikmin! Sweet!". Plus, who didn't see this coming; 8 years of waiting, no information during that time, and finally Nintendo decides to unvail it first in their e3 presentation! Sign your name for support!
  2. Emperor Bulblax (talk) 13:11, 24 August 2012 (EDT)

Oppose[edit]

  1. — {EspyoT} 07:24, 25 July 2012 (EDT) It's just a small stub with random tidbits of info for now. Not mention-worthy, specially not something we want on the main page. This article will be featured in the future, no question about it, but for now, leave it be.
  2. GP - as Espyo.
  3. ~PikFan23 Per above.
  4. Los Plagas (talk)- Yes, it's not exactly high quality as it is now. Plus, it really doesn't have much information yet. It's just made up of hints that the developers dropped and a few elements of the game. This article should only be considered once Pikmin 3 is released and we're able to play the game and know about all of it's elements.

Puffy Blowhog[edit]

I nominate the page Puffy Blowhog to be featured. It is a very neat and tidy article, has lots of information, an image, and info on any glitches there might be involving blowhogs. It is also very detailed, and everything about it just seems right. I have also just fixed it up, giving it much better sentence structure, and it now sound even more fluid to read than it did before. On top of that, the Burrowing Snagret article has been featured for almost a year, and we will need to find a replacement featured article instead.

Support[edit]

  1. Los Plagas (talk) - Nominator.

Oppose[edit]

  1. GP - Doesn't read great, not particularly well-organised, not very long, and the images aren't the best. A good enough article, but not worth being featured, IMO.

Comments[edit]

It's pretty well organized, but it's so short... If there are other articles that would be better highlighted, I'd prefer one of those. Otherwise, I can support this nomination. — {EspyoT} 07:18, 8 February 2013 (EST)

I'm going to side with Espyo on this one. I'm neutral on it. --FREAK ~GameGame Freak Logo.png Freak~OUT!

The introduction alone is a mess. I think the information isn't that bad but it needs a lot of rewriting first.--Prezintenden

Saved game selection menu[edit]

No comments

Support[edit]

  1. (Nominator:) The most complete menu article, with a fascinating section on the orb color mechanic in Pikmin 2. — Soprano(talk) 04:39, May 16, 2021 (EDT)
  2. — {EspyoT} 15:09, May 17, 2021 (EDT)

Oppose[edit]

  1. I'm changing my support of this one to opposition, as the saved game selection menu is just not notable enough to be featured. It has an interesting section, but the article as a whole is just not very interesting. The only menus notable enough to be featured are probably the area selection menu and title screen. — Soprano(talk) 00:15, October 7, 2021 (EDT)
  2. Yeah, guess so. — {EspyoT} 15:45, October 9, 2021 (EDT)
  3. This seems like an awfully specific and niche thing to have as a featured article. Of all the things I could think to showcase, a screen you typically look at for just a couple seconds at a time isn't one of them. Midnight blue (talk) 20:15, January 24, 2023 (EST)

Musings of a Sidekick[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. (Nominator:) It's a small page, and it's not important, but it could be a fun little page to feature that I doubt many people know about. Burrhead2 (talk) 10:25, September 18, 2022 (EDT)
  2. It's so small and simple but...I really can't say no. — {EspyoT} 11:05, September 18, 2022 (EDT)

Oppose[edit]

  1. In my opinion this article is too basic to be a featured article. Most of it is just a very long quote, with the only Pikipedia-written section being the introduction. So while featuring this would raise awareness of this little-known piece of media, it doesn't show the best of what the wiki has to offer. — Soprano(talk) 18:22, September 18, 2022 (EDT)
  2. Like Soprano said, this article is too small. The only Pikipedia content is the first three lines of the page, the rest is a long quote. I understand wanting to promote an obscure content, but the featured article template is made to show high quality pages in the wiki, not for promotion. — GGabryy(talk) 21:24, March 28, 2024 (CET)
  3. Just like the others said, it is basically a quote with three actual sentences. I have been on this wiki for 2 days and know it shouldn’t be featured. No offense, Burrhead. Blowhog Time (talk) 15:51, June 8, 2026 (UTC)

Comments[edit]

  • I'm honestly torn on this one. While I love the Musings of a Sidekick thing and would love to raise awareness of this somewhat famous yet still obscure promo content, I'm not really sure if smaller articles are the best candidates for showcasing on the front page of the wiki. If we're really that concerned about our featured articles needing to represent the size and quality of wiki articles in general, then this is probably not the one to use. Midnight blue (talk) 20:07, January 24, 2023 (EST)

Cherrystone Pass[edit]

Rejected to reduce the number of Hey! Pikmin area article nominations by only keeping the nominations of articles about more interesting areas; no opposers or comments

Support[edit]

  1. (Nominator:) A mostly complete Hey! Pikmin stage that could likely use some cleanup before being featured. — Twins1105 (talk) 21:24, September 2, 2024 (EDT)

Serene Stream[edit]

Rejected to reduce the number of Hey! Pikmin area article nominations by only keeping the nominations of articles about more interesting areas; no opposers or comments

Support[edit]

  1. (Nominator:) A mostly complete Hey! Pikmin stage that could likely use some cleanup before being featured. — Twins1105 (talk) 21:24, September 2, 2024 (EDT)

Ancient Sirehound[edit]

Support[edit]

  1. (Nominator:) Support: 1. Might as well keep the Space Dog streak going lol 2. One of the best designed bosses in my opinion Oppose: 1. Other opinions exist 2. Others may not want sirehound 3. idk lol Breadbuglover-714 12:08, January 9, 2025 (EST)

Oppose[edit]

  1. It'd be a pretty horrible idea to have such a massive spoiler as the newest Pikmin game's final boss as a feature of the front page. -Gulliblepikmin 15:20, January 9, 2025 (EST)
  2. It's a good article, but it would be too much of a spoiler to be a featured article. — Soprano(talk) 18:45, January 13, 2025 (EST)

Comments[edit]

  • Fair, maybe Moss, or is that also too big of a spoiler to be featured either? Breadbuglover-714
    • The Moss article is probably not too big of a spoiler to be featured. A separate nomination could be made for it. — Soprano(talk) 05:36, May 28, 2025 (EDT)
Retrieved from "https://www.pikminwiki.com/index.php?title=Pikipedia:Featured_article/archived_rejected_nominations&oldid=353326"